16 Relations Pick two16 relations16 typesvs. other testsTheoryRead firstRU日本語

8 / 16

Business

ビジネス関係 · Деловые

Few words, and still it moves forward.

ビジネス関係 / one of the sixteen relations

Do something together and it simply moves. The arrangements mesh, the values do not collide. An association built around the task at hand is the best form for these two.

BUSINESS

01  When you first meet

Work starts at once

Talk of the task is quick. Your sense of arrangements is close, and what needs deciding is decided at once. The division of roles settles naturally. As someone to do something with, there is no trouble from the start.

On the other hand, small talk does not continue. Away from the task, no common topic can be found. Not awkward; there is simply nothing to talk about.

As a working partner, this relation is complete from the start.

02  After a while

You do not know each other much

It happens that you have worked together for years and know almost nothing of the other's private life. There is trust. Only, it never becomes talk of the inner life.

What you hold dear differs, so the object of the other's enthusiasm does not register. No denial, and respect too. Only, it is not shared.

For that, there is no friction either. Values do not collide because they are never set against each other in the first place. As someone in the same organisation, this is quite easy.

03  If it is to last

You can team up again any time

The project ends, the department changes, the deal closes. There, contact breaks off. No quarrel, and not much regret either.

Even so, once there is a task again, it is back to normal at once. A gap causes no trouble. This relation can be started up whenever it is needed.

If this is someone you want to keep, creating a shared task is the surest way. It will not last on small talk, but with work it lasts for years.

Telling it from other relations

There are several relations where "the distance never closes". They divide by whether the work meshes.

The difference from super-ego
Super-ego does not mesh even in work. Polite, but no progress. Business, in work, moves for certain. This is the decisive difference.
The difference from kindred
Kindred fits in talk yet diverges in the steps. Business is the reverse: the steps fit yet talk does not continue. The places that mesh are swapped.
The difference from illusionary
Illusionary is pleasant to be with but does not move. Business has no particular pleasantness but moves.

Where this relation is useful

Where a purpose is shared, this is among the easiest of the sixteen to handle.

Suited to joint work
Arrangements mesh and values do not collide. As a working partner it functions beyond any comfort score.
You do not have to try to be close
Try to close the distance and both are at a loss. An association built around the task, as it is, is the best form of this relation.
Use the task to maintain the relation
Breaking off causes no problem, but for someone you want to keep, creating a shared task is the sure method.

PROne thing for this relation

A relation that moves forward with few words, so tools for work.

Works that draw this relation

Chosen from works where the relationship between the two is itself the centre of the story.

This is not a typing of the characters. They are listed as examples where the shape of this relation is drawn clearly.

Songs this relation runs through

Chosen from songs whose subject is exactly what happens between the two.

No lyrics are quoted. The songs are listed for the shape of relation they deal with.

Business in Model A: what talks to what

Example: INTJ and INFJ. Every pair in this relation connects the same positions in the same way; only the elements inside change.

INTJ · LIIINFJ · EIIEGO1 leadingTiintroverted logic2 creativeNeextraverted intuitionSUPER-EGO4 vulnerableSeextraverted sensing3 roleFiintroverted ethicsSUPER-ID6 mobilizingSiintroverted sensing5 suggestiveFeextraverted ethicsID8 demonstrativeNiintroverted intuition7 ignoringTeextraverted logic1 leadingFiintroverted ethics2 creativeNeextraverted intuition4 vulnerableSeextraverted sensing3 roleTiintroverted logic6 mobilizingSiintroverted sensing5 suggestiveTeextraverted logic8 demonstrativeNiintroverted intuition7 ignoringFeextraverted ethics

Lines connect the same element in the other person's structure. 1–2 (strong) 3 (role) 4 (vulnerable) 5–6 (wanted) 7–8 (capable, indifferent)

1 → 3TiINTJ's 1 (leading) Ti (introverted logic) sits in INFJ's position 3 (role). What INTJ does as a matter of course lands on INFJ's sore spot. Pressure without malice.
2 → 2NeINTJ's 2 (creative) Ne (extraverted intuition) sits in INFJ's position 2 (creative). Both strong here. Same ground: fast understanding, and some rivalry.
3 → 1FiINTJ's 3 (role) Fi (introverted ethics) sits in INFJ's position 1 (leading). INFJ leads exactly where INTJ is weak. INTJ feels seen through.
4 → 4SeINTJ's 4 (vulnerable) Se (extraverted sensing) sits in INFJ's position 4 (vulnerable). Both weak. The same thing goes wrong for both.
7 → 5TeINTJ's 7 (ignoring) Te (extraverted logic) sits in INFJ's position 5 (suggestive). INTJ has what INFJ wants without noticing. Appears only when asked.
8 → 8NiINTJ's 8 (demonstrative) Ni (introverted intuition) sits in INFJ's position 8 (demonstrative). Both capable, both indifferent. Left alone.

The 8 pairs in this relation

Business is symmetric: it looks the same from either side.

The sixteen relations

4040jk version